|
>Home
[ Technical Papers ]
Ambiophonics
|
Contrasting
ITU 5.1 and Panor-ambiophonic 4.1 Surround Sound Recording Using OCT and
Sphere Microphones For fair comparison, 5.1 and PanAmbio recordings were made simultaneously, both in the concert hall and the studio, using best practices in the experience of the author: OCT and dual Ambiophone (essentially two sphere microphones with acoustic baffle) comprised of small diaphragm condenser microphones (Figure 12). For ITU 5.1, the OCT array consisted of five microphones: a cardioid and two supercardioids optimized for off-axis pickup mixed with omnis to support bass reproduction. For the opera, a spot microphone was mixed according to the Room Related Balancing technique [6]. Figures 13, 14, 15 show the main array and its placement.
5.1 and PanAmbio mixes were made of all six recordings and encoded on DTS audio CDs for convenient replay for demonstrations and future listener tests. For music, no equalization, effects, or dynamic compression was used. In informal listening sessions, independent recording engineers and musicians involved in the recordings reported generally that, with both reproduction systems, the recordings were among the most realistic they had heard, and that in particular the localization of PanAmbio was the most accurate. We hope to verify these conclusions in future formal listening tests using trained auditioners [16]. Observing the highly accurate indication of positioning of instruments and vicarious enjoyment of the "live" performance by these critical listeners, the author feels it is safe to claim that, using these techniques, both ITU 5.1 and PanAmbio 4.1 are significantly more satisfying than conventional stereo in the realism and natural reproduction of music. << Previous Page | Next Page >> Article Pages 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |